(provisional translation)
  
    | BASIC VIEWPOINTS TO THE CAPITAL INJECTIONS AND RESULTS OF THE 
    EXAMINATIONS OF APPLICANT BANKS | 
 
Financial Reconstruction Commission
March 12, 1999
  - Since its establishment on December 15, 1998, the Financial Reconstruction Commission 
    (FRC) has spent a total of 32 days studying the issue of the capital injections for banks.
 
 
- On January 20, the FRC finalized and made public a report entitled “The Basic 
    Operating Policy of the Financial Reconstruction Commission”. This was followed on 
    January 25 by the release of “Guidelines on Write-Offs and Provisioning against Bad 
    Debts by Applicants for Capital Injections”, in which the FRC laid down quantitative 
    standards for provisioning against bad debts by internationally active banks applying for 
    the capital injections.
 
 
- In accordance with the Financial Function Early Strengthening Law (Article 4, Section 
    6), the FRC held hearings with the Bank of Japan and the Deposit Insurance Corporation, 
    and then from January 26, launched a preliminary examination of the fifteen banks expected 
    to apply for the capital injections. 1
 
 
- In the course of the preliminary examination, the FRC was provided with the results of 
    on-site inspections conducted by the Inspection Department of the Financial Supervisory 
    Agency and the Bank of Japan. The FRC also examined drafts of “the plan for restoring 
    sound management” submitted by the applicant banks and held direct hearings with their 
    representatives. As a result of these preliminary studies, the FRC informed of the banks 
    on February 12 that it agreed to their going ahead with formal procedure for the capital 
    injections. 
 
 
On March 4, the FRC received formal applications from the fifteen banks it had 
    made preliminary examinations of. It then proceeded with its further deliberations 
    including by conducting another hearings with representatives of the applicant banks on 
    March 8. The FRC’s basic viewpoints in its examinations are outlined in the following 
    section.
 
  - To provide sufficient capital injections for the recipient banks to substantially finish 
    disposing of their bad debts, to regain the confidence of the domestic and foreign 
    financial markets, and to restore trust in the Japanese financial system.
 
 
- To promote smooth flows of credit, thereby contributing to the revitalization of the 
    economy such as improvements in business activity and employment.
 
 
- To improve the competitiveness and profitability of the banks, thereby enabling the 
    earliest possible recovery of invested funds through the sale of the preferred stock on 
    the market. 
 
 
- In the course of implementing the capital injections, to do away with the “convoy-style” 
    of bank regulation in favor of clearly articulated rules and more transparent 
    administration. 
 
  
    | 2. | Soundness of financial position (even before the injection) | 
  - Examinations of the financial soundness of the fifteen applicant banks confirmed that 
    they were not insolvent and their equity-capital bases were sound at the end of September 
    1998.
 
 
- The banks were also judged to be capable of raising their equity capital by a 
    substantial margin through self-financing and by using net operating profits even before 
    the injection of public funds in March 1999. Thus, their continued existence was not 
    thought to be “extremely precarious” as defined under the Financial Function Early 
    Strengthening Law the first sentence of Sub-section 2, Section 1, Article 7.
 
  
    | 3. | Amount of the capital injections | 
  - If Japanese banks are to restore the domestic and foreign confidence, it is deemed 
    essential that they dispose appropriately of their non-performing loans and unrealized 
    losses from securities holdings.
 
 
- For this purpose, internationally active banks at the least should be expected to 
    substantially finish disposing of their non-performing loans by the end of March 1999 
    through sufficient write-offs and provisioning therefor as required by the “Guidelines 
    on Write-Offs and Provisioning against Bad Debts by Applicants for Capital Injections”.2
 
 
- The banks are encouraged to dispose of unrealized losses from securities holdings as 
    soon as possible with the introduction of mark-to-market accounting in March 2002 in 
    sight. Where the unrealized losses will not be actually disposed of under current 
    accounting standards, the FRC has given to it a favorable consideration in its examination 
    of applied capital injections.
 
 
- According to such an approach, by consolidating their capital bases using government 
    guarantees as well as using net operating profits and raising capital independently from 
    the private sector, the banks should thus be able to ensure sufficient capital accounts 
    even after taking into account the size of disposed non-performing loan and unrealized 
    losses from securities holdings.3
 
 
- In order to address the problem of credit crunch, the applicant banks are sure to 
    increase lending to domestic firms, especially to small and medium-sized enterprises, in 
    fiscal 1999 (in real terms taking into consideration special factors).
 
  
    | 4. | Plans for restoring sound management | 
  - For domestic and foreign confidence in Japan’s financial system to be restored, the 
    profitability of banks must be improved through business restructuring, rationalization, 
    and realignment of the financial industry. It was with this objective in mind that the FRC 
    examined the applicant banks’ plans for restoring sound management.
 
 
- Business restructuring and rationalization plans are assessed from the viewpoint of the 
    financial market as a whole. Improvements in profitability and implementation of 
    fundamental structural reforms based on clear and specific strategies rather than 
    restructuring across the board is therefore rated highly. Withdrawal from non-profitable 
    operations, including business in overseas markets, is viewed in a particularly positive 
    light.4
 
 
- The applicant banks need to create a wasteless and strong management base and thus 
    improve profitability through rationalization including, for example, cutting personnel 
    expenses and other fixed costs. Cutbacks in personnel and non-personnel expenses (barring 
    expenditure on mechanization) and the abolition of posts for senior counselors and 
    advisers are therefore viewed positively.5
 
 
- A process of realignment is practically underway in the financial sector, with banks and 
    other institutions merging, forming subsidiaries, and entering tie-ups in terms of capital 
    consolidation or business operations. These moves are viewed positively and are expected 
    to improve the profitability and financial position of the applicant banks.6
 
 
- Other improvements made under the plans for restoring sound management which also 
    contribute to the positive assessment of a bank include raising funds independently, 
    developing concrete plans for liquidating non-performing loans, maintaining reliable 
    credit rating system of its own, and cutting dividends and bonuses for directors to 
    minimize the drain on profits.
 
 
  
    | 5. | Characteristics of instruments  | 
  - Instruments such as convertible preferred stock, which can be credited to capital 
    accounts, are to be used rather than subordinated debentures or loans as the main means 
    for the capital injection, considering that the injected funds are actually earmarked to 
    the disposal of bad debts. 
 
 
- The terms for underwriting such instruments require that dividend yields be determined 
    in accordance with the “Basic Policy for Dividend Yield of Preferred Stock” issued on 
    December 17, 1998, and are based on the following basic principles:
 
 
      
        | - | In principle, total yield on the Financial Function Early Strengthening Account should 
        be such as not to fall below the account’s financing costs. 
 
 |  
        | - | The dividend yield on the preferred stock of each individual bank should be the same 
        as, or higher than the official discount rate, this being the minimum financing rate of 
        the Financial Function Early Strengthening Account. 
 
 |  
        | - | The dividend yield on the ordinary stock of each individual bank should not in 
        principle exceed the dividend yield on the preferred stock. 
 
 |  
        | - | The dividend yield on the preferred stock should reflect each individual bank’s 
        allowable financing costs. 
 
 |  
 
  - Specifically, dividend yields are determined as set forth below: 
 
 
      
        | 1) | In the first stage, the FRC assumed market rates 
        applied to each bank which reflects that bank’s profitability, its funding capability, 
        and its capacity to assume risk. In this assumption, however, in line with the aims of the 
        Financial Function Early Strengthening Law, it is premised that the capital injections 
        restore domestic and foreign confidence and eliminate the uneasiness in the financial 
        system exemplified by the Japan premium.
 
 | 
      
        | 2) | In the second stage, dividend yields are calculated 
        in accordance with ordinary market practices, reflecting individual instrument’s terms 
        proposed in each bank’s application.7
 
 | 
      
        | 3) | Finally, where a bank takes sufficient steps toward 
        business restructuring, rationalization, and adaptation to financial realignment, its 
        dividend yield reflects the positive assessment of such moves as described in the above 
        Section 4, due to their anticipated beneficial effect on the bank’s financial and 
        business position.8
 
 | 
    
    
  
    | III. | Results of the examination and the follow-up 
    procedure | 
  - After thorough examinations of the applications and plans for restoring sound management 
    of the fifteen applicant banks, with the basic viewpoints outlined so far, the FRC 
    concluded that their applications should be approved. The capital injections will 
    therefore be carried out at the end of March once the necessary procedures have been 
    completed, and this should serve to restore domestic and foreign confidence in the 
    Japanese financial system.
 
 
- The banks that receive the capital injection will be expected to practice sound 
    management and improve their profitability in line with the objectives of capital 
    injections and in accordance with their plans for restoring sound management. In the event 
    of a recipient bank’s failure without good cause (such as a significant worsening of the 
    economy) to implement important fundamental parts of its plan for restore sound 
    management, managerial responsibility should be clarified.
 
 
- Under the Financial Function Early Strengthening Law(Article 5, Section 4), the 
    recipient banks will be required to report to the FRC on, inter alia, steps being taken 
    toward business restructuring, rationalization, and adaptation to financial realignment as 
    committed in their plans for restoring sound management, and to make the reports public. 
    This should encourage the banks to commit themselves firmly to make improvements.
 
 
- If a bank finds a positive reason for doing so (e.g. stepping up its effort for business 
    restructuring or adaptation to financial realignment efforts), it may be allowed to revise 
    its plan for restoring sound management.
 
 
- If the above reports indicate that a recipient bank lacks an intention to properly 
    implement its plan for restoring sound management, then the FRC will take appropriate 
    measures stipulated in the Banking Law, as necessary, under the Financial Function Early 
    Strengthening Law (Article 20, Section 2).
 
 
- The capital injections on this occasion will substantially complete disposing the bad 
    debts at the leading banks. Furthermore, by helping a new round of financial realignment 
    associated with the capital injections which proceeds simultaneously with the realignment 
    caused by the Japan’s financial “Big Bang”, the FRC will contribute to the 
    improvement of the financial system’s efficiency.
  
    | The Industrial Bank of Japan, Ltd. | The Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank, Ltd. | The Sakura Bank, Ltd. | 
  
    | The Fuji Bank, Ltd. | The Sumitomo Bank, Ltd. | The Daiwa Bank, Ltd. | 
  
    | The Sanwa Bank, Ltd. | The Tokai Bank, Ltd. | The Asahi Bank, Ltd. | 
  
    | The Bank of Yokohama, Ltd. | The Mitsui Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. |  | 
  
    | The Mitsubishi Trust & Banking Corp. | The Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. |  | 
  
    | The Toyo Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. | The Chuo Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. |  | 
 
Debt forgiveness should be carried out only after due consideration is given to such 
factors as business rationality (e.g. if this would improve the chances of recovering 
remaining claims), clarification of the locus of managerial responsibility at the 
borrowing firm, and the social influence of the borrower. The banks are encouraged to make 
sufficient prior provision to cover the projected amount of forgiven claims.
Subtracting the remaining unrealized losses from securities holdings from the amount of 
equity capital after the injections of capital are received would give the applicant banks 
real capital adequacy ratios of around 10%.
The plans for restoring sound management of the applicant banks provide for 
complete withdrawal from overseas operations by regional banks, the closure of 
non-profitable overseas branches, and reform of branch business structures (See Material 
12).
The plans for restoring sound management of the applicant banks require cuts in 
personnel and non-personnel expenses, cutbacks in the number of directors, and the 
abolition of adviser positions (See Material 13).
Specific instances of such developments include mergers between trust banks, the 
establishment of subsidiaries or joint investments involving city and trust banks, and 
inter-regional and inter-sectoral business tie-ups (See Material 14).
The dividend yields on preferred stock tend to be lower than that on subordinated 
debentures and loans, since it is closer to pure capital. The dividend yield on a 
preferred stock that represents a better investment for investors (e.g. because the 
minimum conversion price is sufficiently lower than the market price, the initial 
conversion price is set at the time of issuance rather than when conversion begins, or the 
conversion period starts early) likewise is lower than that on other preferred stock.
(1) and (2) above are based on common market practice, while (3) incorporates as 
exogenous factors the results of assessments made in accordance with certain criteria of 
improvements made under applicant banks’ plans for restoring sound management.
next